OpenStack Technical Committee Charter¶
The Technical Committee (“TC”) is tasked with providing the technical leadership for OpenStack as a whole (all official projects, as defined below). It enforces OpenStack ideals (Openness, Transparency, Commonality, Integration, Quality…), decides on issues affecting multiple projects, forms an ultimate appeals board for technical decisions, and generally has technical oversight over all of OpenStack.
OpenStack Project Teams¶
OpenStack “Project Teams” are groups of people dedicated to the completion of the OpenStack project mission, which is ‘’to produce a ubiquitous Open Source Cloud Computing platform that is easy to use, simple to implement, interoperable between deployments, works well at all scales, and meets the needs of users and operators of both public and private clouds.’’ Project Teams may create any code repository and produce any deliverable they deem necessary to achieve their goals.
The work of project teams is performed under the oversight of the TC. Contributing to one of their associated code repositories grants you automatic AC status (see below). The TC has ultimate authority over which project teams are designated as official OpenStack projects. The projects are listed in Projects.
Project Team Leads¶
Project Team Leads (“PTLs”) manage day-to-day operations, drive the team goals and resolve technical disputes within their team. Each team should be self-managing by the contributors, and all disputes should be resolved through active debate and discussion by the community itself. However if a given debate cannot be clearly resolved, the PTL can decide the outcome. Although the TC is generally not involved in team-internal decisions, it still has oversight over team decisions, especially when they affect other teams or go contrary to general OpenStack goals.
The TC is composed of directly-elected members. It is partially renewed using elections every 6 months. All TC members must be OpenStack Foundation individual members. You can cumulate any other role, including Foundation Director, with a TC seat.
After each election, the TC proposes one of its members to act as the TC chair. In case of multiple candidates, it may use a single-winner election method to decide the result (see below). The Board of Directors has the authority to approve the TC chair and shall approve the proposition, unless otherwise justified by its bylaws. The TC chair is responsible for making sure meetings are held according to the rules described below, and for communicating the decisions taken during those meetings to the Board of Directors and the OpenStack community at large. It may be revoked under the conditions described in the Foundation bylaws.
The elected TC chair will seek another TC member to volunteer to serve as vice chair until the next chair election is held. The chair may delegate some regular duties to the vice chair. In addition to any delegated tasks, the vice chair is responsible for being ready to step in and fulfill the responsibilities of the TC chair when the elected chair is not available.
The current TC chair is in charge of the next TC chair election, and stays in charge of TC chair duties until the next TC chair is elected.
The community should not wait for a formal meeting to raise issues or
bring questions to the Technical Committee (see
2017-04-25 Replace Technical Committee meetings). In most cases,
asynchronous communication via email or gerrit is preferred over
meetings. If a topic will require significant discussion or to need
input from members of the community other than the committee, start a
mailing list discussion on
openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
and use the subject tag
[tc] to bring it to the attention of
Technical Committee members.
TC status meetings
are public and held monthly in the
#openstack-tc channel on the OFTC IRC network. The meeting
time is decided among TC members after each election. The TC maintains
an open list of candidate topics for the agenda on the wiki. Anyone
may add items to the list, and the chair or vice chair will set and
publicize the agenda before each meeting.
For a meeting to be actually held, at least half of the members need to be present (rounded up: in a 13-member committee that means a minimum of 7 people present). Non-members affected by a given discussion are strongly encouraged to participate in the meeting and voice their opinion, though only TC members can ultimately cast a vote.
Motions presented before the TC should be discussed publicly to give a chance to the wider community to express their opinion. Motions should therefore be announced on the development mailing list and posted to Gerrit for review for a minimum of 7 calendar days.
TC members can vote positively, negatively, or abstain (using the “RollCall-Vote” in Gerrit). Decisions need more positive votes than negative votes (ties mean the motion is rejected), and a minimum of positive votes of at least one third of the total number of TC members (rounded up: in a 13-member committee that means a minimum of 5 approvers).
Patches with motions should use the gerrit topic tag
Election for PTL seats¶
PTL seats are completely renewed every development cycle. A separate election is run for each project team. The election nomination as well as the voting period should be open for fourteen days (2 weeks for each phase). These elections are collectively held (from the nomination start date until the voting end date) no later than 2 weeks prior to each cycle final release date (on or before ‘R-2’ week)
If a PTL seat is vacated before the end of the cycle for which the individual
was elected or after the election (means leaderless project), the TC will
appoint a new PTL or move that project to the Distributed Project Leadership
model (see 2020-08-03 Distributed Project Leadership),
in consultation with the outgoing PTL and any interested candidates, following
the process for leaderless project teams (see
2014-11-28 Process for Leaderless Programs). An
email must be sent to the
openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org mailing
list announcing the change in leadership. A patch must also be submitted to the
https://opendev.org/openstack/governance repository updating the project’s
PTL information in
projects.yaml, which must be approved by the TC in order
for the appointed candidate to officially assume PTL responsibilities.
Any exception to PTL election schedule needs to be recorded in Election Exceptions
Voters for PTL seats (“APC”)¶
Voters for a given project’s PTL election are the Active Project Contributors (“APC”), which are a subset of the Foundation Individual Members. Individual Members who committed a change to a repository of a project over the last two 6-month release cycles are considered APC for that project team.
Candidates for PTL seats¶
Any APC can propose their candidacy for the corresponding project PTL election. Sitting PTLs are eligible to run for re-election each cycle, provided they continue to meet the criteria.
Election for TC seats¶
The TC seats are partially renewed twice a year using staggered elections. Members are elected for a term that expires at the conclusion of the second scheduled election after the start of their term or after 14 months, whichever is shorter. For this election we’ll use a multiple-winner election system see below). The election nomination as well as the voting period should be open for fourteen days (2 weeks for each phase). The election is held (from the nomination start date until the voting end date) no earlier than 8 weeks and no later than 2 weeks prior to each cycle final release date (between ‘R-8’ and ‘R-2’ week).
If required, TC and PTL elections can be held as combined election.
If a seat on the TC is vacated before the end of the term for which the member was elected, the TC will select a replacement to serve out the remainder of the term. The mechanism for selecting the replacement depends on when the seat is vacated relative to the beginning of the candidacy period for the next scheduled TC election. Selected candidates must meet all other constraints for membership in the TC.
If the vacancy opens less than four weeks before the candidacy period for the next scheduled TC election begins, and the seat vacated would have been contested in the upcoming election anyway, then the seat will remain open until the election and filled by the normal election process.
If the vacancy opens less than four weeks before the candidacy period for the next scheduled TC election begins and the seat would not have been contested in the upcoming election, the candidates who do not win seats in the election will be consulted in the order they appear in the results until a candidate who is capable of serving agrees to serve out the partial term.
If the vacancy opens with more than four weeks until the candidacy period for the next scheduled TC election begins, regardless of whether the vacated seat would have been contested in the next election, the candidates who did not win seats in the most recent previous TC election will be consulted in the order they appear in the results until a candidate who is capable of serving agrees to serve out the partial term.
If there is no candidate available to fill the vacancy as per above mentioned criteria (either no extra candidate from election results or none of the candidates who do not win in previous elections accept the vacant TC partial term), then special election is held to fill the vacancy.
Until vacant seat is filled, the current number of TC members will be counted as complete TC members to continue the work on motions, charter change etc.
Any exception to TC election schedule needs to be recorded in Election Exceptions
Voters for TC seats (“AC”)¶
The TC seats are elected by the Active Contributors (“AC”), which are a subset of the Foundation Individual Members. Individual Members who committed a change to a repository under any of the official OpenStack Project Teams (as defined in Projects) over the last two 6-month release cycles are automatically considered AC by their technical contributions which are easy to mine and count. Specific contributors who did not have a change recently accepted in one of the OpenStack projects, but nevertheless consider themselves a contributor to the community, can apply for AC either by sending an email to the TC chair or by being nominated by an existing AC via email to the TC chair. Final approval on the exception is decided by the TC itself, and is valid one year (two elections). Examples of non-technical or hard-to-quantify contributions include (but are not limited to):
Bug triaging not tracked in Gerrit
SIG membership and involvement
Technical committee working group members
Regular participation in code review or team feedback
We renamed the previously used term “ATC” to “AC” and the ‘Active Technical Contributors (“ATC”)’ term mentioned in the Foundation bylaws is the same as ‘Active Contributors (“AC”)’ mentioned here.
Candidates for TC seats¶
Any Foundation individual member can propose their candidacy for an available, directly-elected TC seat. Appendix 4 of the Foundation Bylaws describe eligibility requirements and membership constraints for the Technical Committee.
Number of seats to elect¶
The Q3 2019 elections elected 6 seats, for a total of 13 members for the Q3-Q4 2019 TC membership. Over 2020 the number of TC seats will be gradually reduced to 9 members, with the following number of seats to elect:
Q1 2020 elections: 5 seats (out of 7 incumbents): 11 members total
Q3 2020 elections: 4 seats (out of 6 incumbents): 9 members total
Each year after 2020, the Q1 election should renew 5 seats, and the Q3 election should renew 4 seats.
For single-winner elections, a Condorcet system shall be used.
For multiple-winner elections, a Condorcet or a STV system should be used.
Amendments to this Technical Committee charter shall be proposed in a special motion, which needs to be approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the total number of TC members (rounded up: in a 13-member committee that means a minimum of 9 approvers).
Patches with charter amendments should use the gerrit topic tag